Rainbow Warrior (New Zealand v. France)

20 R.I.A.A. 217 (1990)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rainbow Warrior (New Zealand v. France)

France-New Zealand Arbitral Tribunal
20 R.I.A.A. 217 (1990)

Facts

In 1985, a civilian vessel, the Rainbow Warrior, was moored in a harbor in Auckland, New Zealand (plaintiff). The Rainbow Warrior was a Greenpeace vessel set to depart for protests against French nuclear testing. To prevent the protests, two French agents, Mafart and Prieur, placed explosive devices and sunk the vessel, causing extensive property damage and one death. The two French agents were arrested and sentenced to 10 years in prison by a New Zealand court. France (defendant) and New Zealand then entered into negotiations concerning the sentences of the two agents. The United Nations secretary-general ruled that the French agents were to serve their sentences on the French military base on the isolated island of Hao for three years. The agents began their sentences in July 1986. In December 1987, Mafart was returned to France for emergency hospital treatment and later released by the French government for “health reasons.” In May 1988, the French government received notification that Prieur was pregnant and her father was terminally ill. Thus, the French government released Prieur for “humanitarian reasons.” New Zealand was not consulted about the transfers and eventual releases of Mafart and Prieur and brought an action against France. France argued that Mafart and Prieur’s situations constituted distress, which required the government to take the action it did.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership