Raintree Homeowners Association v. Bleimann

342 N.C. 159, 463 S.E.2d 72 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Raintree Homeowners Association v. Bleimann

North Carolina Supreme Court
342 N.C. 159, 463 S.E.2d 72 (1995)

RW

Facts

Karl and Rena Bleimann (defendants) decided to replace their house’s original wood siding with vinyl. As they were required to do by their subdivision’s restrictive covenants, the Bleimanns applied for permission from the subdivision’s architectural review committee (ARC). The ARC had previously turned down a similar application. In the course of processing that application, the ARC investigated vinyl siding’s characteristics and concluded that vinyl was not harmonious with the subdivision’s architectural style and wooded setting. The Bleimanns assured the ARC that they had selected a higher-grade vinyl that could replicate wood’s desirable qualities, and that their immediate neighbors did not object to their plan. Nevertheless, the ARC turned down the Bleimanns’ application. When the Bleimanns proceeded with their project anyway, the Raintree Homeowners Association, Inc. (Raintree) (plaintiff) sued to stop them. The trial jury returned its verdict for the Bleimanns. The trial court denied Raintree’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and was affirmed by an intermediate appellate court. Raintree appealed to the North Carolina Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Frye, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership