Raishevich v. Foster

247 F.3d 337 (2001)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Raishevich v. Foster

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
247 F.3d 337 (2001)

JL

Facts

Boris Raishevich (plaintiff) collected photographic transparencies of cannabis plants. A total of 347 transparencies were seized by the police when Raishevich was arrested. All of the transparencies were destroyed by Charles Foster (defendant), a police evidence custodian. Raishevich sued Foster, seeking damages to compensate for the destroyed transparencies. The trial court received conflicting evidence during a bench trial and determined that the value of each transparency was $200. The trial court then noted the lack of evidence related to Raishevich’s past earnings from the transparencies and determined that Raishevich’s peak publication rate would be two times per year. Based on this, the trial court calculated damages over a 30-year period at $12,000. Finally, the trial court decided to double the $12,000, resulting in a total award of $24,000, to account for the fact that Foster’s destruction of the transparencies may have hindered Raishevich’s ability to prove damages with greater specificity. After the trial court’s decision, Foster requested a reduction in damages. The trial court then reduced the damages award by half, back down to $12,000, because it had improperly applied the Bigelow principle twice. Raishevich appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Straub, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership