Rales v. Blasband
Delaware Supreme Court
634 A.2d 927 (Del. 1993)
Stephen and Mitchell Rales (defendants) were directors, officers, and majority shareholders of Easco Hand Tools, Inc. (Easco). Easco made an offering of senior subordinated notes. Part of proceeds was to be invested in government securities. Instead, the Raleses allegedly invested in junk bonds to help an investment bank with which they had a business relationship. Blasband (plaintiff) was a shareholder in Easco. Easco later became a wholly owned subsidiary of Danaher Corp. (Danaher), and Blasband became a Danaher stockholder. Blasband filed a derivative lawsuit about the Easco board’s misuse of funds. Blasband did not make demand to sue on either Easco or Danaher’s board. The Raleses are 44 percent shareholders and directors of Danaher. The third circuit held that Blasband’s complaint cast reasonable doubt on whether the Easco board exercised its business judgment. The district court certified the question to the Delaware Supreme Court to determine the demand requirements for a double derivative lawsuit under Delaware law.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Veasey, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.