Ralston Purina Co. v. McNabb
United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
381 F. Supp. 181 (1974)
Ralston Purina Company (company) (plaintiff) contracted to buy soybeans from F. R. McNabb (defendant), to be delivered in November 1972. That fall, heavy rains devastated McNabb’s crop, and McNabb delivered less than a tenth of the promised amount by the delivery date. Each month from December 1972 through February 1973, the company sent McNabb letters permitting him to go on delivering soybeans. Each month, McNabb sent the company another small shipment of soybeans. The company managed to cover its losses in March 1973 and sued McNabb in federal district court to recover the difference between the contract and cover prices. The court rejected McNabb’s sole defense, the impossibility of performance due to bad weather, and found McNabb in breach. McNabb contended that the company’s damages should be measured as of November 1972, the original date for contract performance. The company argued that its December 1972 – February 1973 letters merely extended the contract performance date, and that McNabb agreed to modify the contract by accepting the extensions and continuing to deliver grain. The company contended that damages should be measured as of March 1973, when it covered its losses. The jury found, based on substantial evidence, that the company showed bad faith in attempting to extend the contract because the company knew that it could claim damages at March 1973 prices, which the company expected to be higher than they were in November 1972.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Brown, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 711,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 711,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.