From our private database of 26,800+ case briefs...
Rambus Inc. v. FTC
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
522 F.3d 456 (D.C. Cir. 2008)
The Joint Electron Device Engineering Council (JEDEC) was a trade organization involved in developing standardized computer-memory technology. During the standardization process, companies often competed to have their patented inventions incorporated into the standard. In 1993, JEDEC voted to adopt the SDRAM standard for computer-memory products, and in 1998, JEDEC voted to adopt an improved version called the DDR SDRAM standard. The completed DDR SDRAM standard incorporated four inventions patented by Rambus Inc. (Rambus) (defendant). Rambus had been an active member of JEDEC since 1992, but voluntarily withdrew membership in 1996. Beginning in 1999, with four of Rambus’s patented inventions now standardized by JEDEC, Rambus asserted its patent rights through licensing negotiations and litigation. In 2002, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (plaintiff) filed a complaint against Rambus, alleging that Rambus’s failure to disclose its interest in the four patented technologies during the standardization process was an unfair and deceptive method of competition in violation of § 5(b) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(b), and constituted monopolization under § 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2. The FTC found that Rambus’s omissions during the standardization process enabled Rambus to extract higher licensing fees than would have otherwise been possible, and entered an order compelling Rambus to adopt reasonable royalty rates. Rambus appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Williams, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 540,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 540,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,800 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.