Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 17,600+ case briefs...

Ramsden v. Farm Credit Services of North Central Wisconsin ACA

Wisconsin Court of Appeals
590 N.W.2d 1 (1998)


Triple L Dairy owned a property in Wisconsin on which it operated a dairy farm. When its cattle began getting sick, Triple L Dairy complained to its creditor, Farm Credit Services of North Central Wisconsin ACA (FCS) (defendant). Thomas Hass (defendant) was an agent of both Agribank (defendant), which had financed Triple L’s purchase, and FCS. After investigating Triple L Dairy’s complaint, Agribank, FCS, and Hass learned that an underground gasoline storage tank on the farm was leaking. The leakage had contaminated the property’s soil and groundwater. The Department of Natural Resources ordered Agribank to remove the oil tank and clean up the contamination. Agribank removed the tank but failed to decontaminate the property. Agribank auctioned the property as a dairy farm, with Hass acting as auctioneer. Mark, Raelynn, and Milton Ramsden (plaintiffs) expressed interest in buying the property. Hass told them that Agribank would pay for any cleanup required by the oil tank’s contamination. He additionally represented that the property was suitable for a dairy farm and that there was plenty of good, clean drinking water. Hass did not inform the Ramsdens that the groundwater was contaminated or that Triple L Dairy’s cattle had died. The Ramsdens bought the property. Within days of moving their cattle to the property, the cattle began to get sick, Mark Ramsden, too, became ill. The Ramsdens had water samples taken and learned that the water was contaminated with benzene. Eventually, 186 cows died of benzene poisoning. The Ramsdens sued Agribank, FCS, and Hass. Hass filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that he could not be held liable for misrepresentations because he made them as an agent. The trial court granted his motion. The Ramsdens appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Roggensack, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 458,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 458,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 17,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial