Rana v. Islam
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
305 F.R.D. 53 (2015)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
Monirul Islam (defendant) served as the consul general of Bangladesh in New York City. Islam and his wife (defendant) employed Mashud Rana (plaintiff), a Bangladeshi citizen, as a personal household worker. Islam and his wife contracted with Rana in Bangladesh, offering to pay a monthly salary, provide days off, and renew Rana’s visa before it expired. Upon arrival in the United States, Rana was allegedly forced into involuntary servitude through threats, restraints, and physical force. Rana was not allowed to talk with anyone outside the house or to make phone calls. Rana was paid none of the promised salary and was provided no days off from work. Rana’s duties primarily consisted of household work for Islam and his family, but Rana also occasionally cooked for guests and at the Bangladesh Consulate. Islam and his family moved to Morocco for Islam to serve as the ambassador of Bangladesh. Islam instructed Rana to move to Morocco with the family, and Rana overheard Islam threaten Rana’s life if he refused to move. Rana fled the residence and filed suit in federal district court, alleging violations of human-trafficking laws, the Fair Labor Standards Act, and state labor laws. Among other arguments, Islam and his wife filed a motion to dismiss the suit for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Islam and his wife claimed that they were immune from civil actions due to consular immunity.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stein, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.