Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stockgrowers of America v. United States Department of Agriculture
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
415 F.3d 1078 (2005)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
In the 1980s, a disease known as mad cow disease spread rapidly and infected cattle in over 25 countries. To contain the spread of the disease, the United States Department of Agriculture (the USDA) (defendant) promulgated several regulations, including one that banned the importation of cattle and cattle products from countries where mad cow disease was confirmed. In 2003, a case of mad cow disease was confirmed in Canada, and thus it was added to the list of banned importations. However, the USDA soon began to relax its ban on Canadian importations of cattle and eventually issued a final rule that once again permitted the importation of Canadian cattle into the United States, despite more cases of mad cow disease being confirmed. The Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stockgrowers of America (R-CALF) (plaintiff) filed suit against the USDA, seeking an injunction to prevent the rule from being implemented. The district court issued the requested preliminary injunction and barred the USDA from implementing the rule. In support of the injunction, the court found that the USDA’s rule was arbitrary and capricious in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The USDA appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tashima, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.