From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Randall’s Food Markets, Inc. v. Johnson
Texas Supreme Court
891 S.W.2d 640 (1995)
Facts
Mary Lynn Johnson (plaintiff), a manager for Randall’s Food Markets, Inc. (Randall’s) (defendant), forgot to pay for a $25 Christmas wreath she held while purchasing several other items. Vernon Davis, the checkout clerk, did not charge Johnson for the wreath after ringing up her other items because Johnson said that she didn’t have anything else to purchase. Two days later when at work, Lewis Simmons, director of the store, escorted Johnson to a back office and questioned her. Mike Seals, the district manager, also wanted to question Johnson later that day, so Simmons asked her to stay at the store. Simmons told Johnson not to go on the store’s floor but that she could wait in the office or work on a volunteer painting project. Johnson decided to wait in the office. While she waited, Johnson left the office twice, once to use the restroom and once to pay for the wreath. When Seals arrived, he and Simmons questioned Johnson further, and then suspended Johnson for 30 days without pay and transferred her to another store. Johnson brought a claim against Randall’s for false imprisonment, defamation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Randall’s moved for summary judgment, and the trial court granted the motion. The court of appeals reversed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Spector, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
