Randall v. Sorrell

548 U.S. 230 (2006)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
R
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Randall v. Sorrell

United States Supreme Court
548 U.S. 230 (2006)

Play video

Facts

In 1997, the State of Vermont enacted a stringent campaign finance law, Pub. Act No. 64 (Act 64). Act 64 imposed mandatory expenditure limits on the total amount a candidate for state office could spend during a two-year general election cycle. Additionally, Act 64 imposed strict contribution limits for any single individual who wished to contribute to the campaign and limited the amount any individual could give to a political party during a two-year general election cycle to $2000. Neil Randall (plaintiff), a Vermont state legislator, brought suit against Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell and the State of Vermont (defendants) in federal district court on the grounds that Act 64 violated the First Amendment. The district court struck down the expenditure limits, but upheld most of the contribution limits as constitutional. The court of appeals reversed, ruling that all the contribution limits were constitutional. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)

Concurrence (Alito, J.)

Concurrence (Kennedy, J.)

Concurrence (Thomas, J.)

Dissent (Stevens, J.)

Dissent (Souter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 788,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Constitutional Law
Election Law