Rashid v. Jolly
Montana Supreme Court
352 Mont. 552, 218 P.3d 499 (2009)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Laura Rashid (plaintiff) sold Dave Jolly (defendant) her mule named Fancy. After Jolly took possession of Fancy, the parties executed an agreement titled “bill of sale,” in which Rashid was granted a right of first refusal if Jolly ever decided to sell Fancy. Years later, Jolly sold Fancy to another family without notifying Rashid. Rashid went on an out-of-state trip to locate Fancy and eventually did. Rashid brought suit against Jolly seeking to recover the costs associated with her search and for return of the mule. The district court ultimately held that Jolly breached the contract and awarded both compensatory and punitive damages to Rashid. Jolly appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.