Rasul v. Bush
United States Supreme Court
542 U.S. 466 (2004)
After the September 11, 2001 attacks, Congress authorized the use of force against the terrorists. Rasul and others (defendants) were captured abroad during the ensuing military campaign. The defendants were held at the U.S. military base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The base is in Cuban territory, but the lease gives the United States jurisdiction. The defendants’ relatives challenged the detentions claiming the defendants are innocent but have not been charged, allowed to talk to an attorney, or access courts. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia deemed the filings habeas corpus petitions and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
Concurrence (Kennedy, J.)
Dissent (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.