Rathje v. Mercy Hospital
Iowa Supreme Court
745 N.W.2d 443 (2008)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
On March 19, 1999, Dr. Dwight Schroeder (defendant) and Mercy Hospital (defendant) treated teenager Georgia Rathje (plaintiff) for alcohol abuse. The treatment included a prescription for Antabuse, a medicine that was supposed to cause an unpleasant reaction to alcohol. Rathje did not drink any alcohol but began to feel nauseous a week later. On April 23, Rathje visited her family doctor, Dr. Jerome Janda, who prescribed stomach medicine. Rathje’s situation got worse, leaving her bedridden, unable to eat, and vomiting a green substance. On April 26, Rathje returned to Janda, who noticed that she seemed jaundiced. Suspecting a gallstone issue, Janda admitted Rathje to a hospital the next day. On that day, April 27, a specialist diagnosed Rathje with possible hepatitis from the Antabuse medicine. Rathje’s condition kept getting worse. Ultimately, the Antabuse caused end-stage liver disease, and Rathje had a liver transplant. On April 26, 2001, Rathje sued Schroeder and Mercy Hospital for medical malpractice, arguing that the Antabuse had caused the liver damage. However, there was a two-year time period for bringing medical-malpractice claims. The trial court found that there was physical evidence of Rathje’s liver injury before April 26, 1999, and that April 26, 2001, was therefore too late for Rathje to file a malpractice claim. The court dismissed the claim. Rathje appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cady, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.