Ratner v. Loudoun County Public Schools

16 F. App’x 140 (2001)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ratner v. Loudoun County Public Schools

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
16 F. App’x 140 (2001)

  • Written by Ann Wooster, JD

Facts

A public-middle-school student, Benjamin Ratner (plaintiff) was told by a classmate that she had contemplated suicide the night before and had unintentionally brought a knife to school in her binder that morning. Ratner had known the classmate for two years and was aware of her previous suicide attempts, so he took the binder from her and put it in his school locker without ever opening the binder. Ratner intended to tell his parents and the classmate’s parents about the knife after school, but he did not report the knife to school authorities. The school dean received information about the knife and asked Ratner about it. Ratner admitted that the binder and knife were in his locker and, at the dean’s direction, got the binder and knife and gave them to the dean. The assistant principal suspended Ratner for 10 days for possessing a knife on school grounds in violation of the zero-tolerance policy of the Loudon County Public Schools (school district) (defendant). The school district held a hearing and suspended Ratner for the rest of the school term, or nearly four months. Ratner and his mother (plaintiff) brought an action in the district court and argued that Ratner’s suspension under the zero-tolerance policy for possession of weapons on school grounds violated Ratner’s due-process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The district court concluded that the school district’s notices and hearings during suspension proceedings to enforce the zero-tolerance policy met procedural-due-process requirements. The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. Ratner and his mother appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

Concurrence (Hamilton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership