From our private database of 28,500+ case briefs...
Rawlings v. Kentucky
United States Supreme Court
448 U.S. 98 (1980)
David Rawlings (defendant) was visiting a home when police arrived with a warrant for one of the home’s residents. The police did not find the resident. During the search, the police smelled marijuana smoke and saw marijuana seeds. Two officers left to get a search warrant, while the remaining officers detained Rawlings and the other occupants of the house. Rawlings was seated on a living-room sofa next to Vanessa Cox, another visitor. Cox’s purse was between them on the sofa. The officers returned with a search warrant, and Cox was ordered to empty her purse onto the coffee table. The contents of her purse included lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and several other controlled substances. Rawlings, who had dumped the drugs into Cox’s purse earlier that day, claimed ownership of the drugs. When police searched him, they found $4,500 in cash as well as a knife. Rawlings was charged by the state of Kentucky (plaintiff) with possession with intent to sell the drugs. Rawlings moved to suppress evidence of the drugs on the theory that the search of Cox’s purse had been illegal and that Rawlings had a reasonable expectation of privacy in Cox’s purse because it contained his property. At the suppression hearing, Rawlings admitted that he did not believe the purse would escape search by the police. The motion was denied, and Rawlings was convicted. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Kentucky affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress, holding that Rawlings had not made a sufficient showing that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the purse.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)
Dissent (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 545,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.