Re Saul D. Harrison & Sons plc

[1995] 1 BCLC 14 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Re Saul D. Harrison & Sons plc

England and Wales Court of Appeal
[1995] 1 BCLC 14 (1995)

Facts

In 1960, the shares of Saul D. Harrison & Sons plc (company) were reorganized into three classes: A shares, which provided voting rights but no dividend rights, and B and C shares, which provided dividend rights but no voting rights. The A shares were owned by the founder’s surviving sons. Most C shares were owned by or held in trust for the founder’s grandchildren, including a granddaughter (plaintiff). The company’s primary business was the manufacture and sale of industrial cloths. In October 1990, the company sold its factory (its main asset) for £2.75 million. The company used the sale proceeds to buy a replacement factory for the same amount. The granddaughter disagreed with the purchase of the replacement factory, contending that the company’s business prospects were so poor that any reasonable board of directors would have shut the business and distributed the company’s assets to the shareholders and that the directors wished to keep the company alive because they and their wives received substantial salaries. Alleging that the directors acted in bad faith, the granddaughter filed a petition in the chancery court seeking an order pursuant to § 459 of the Companies Act 1985 requiring the company’s other members to buy her shares because the company was being run in a manner that was unfairly prejudicial to the class C shareholders. In the alternative, the granddaughter requested a ruling that it would be just and equitable to wind up the company. The chancery court rejected the granddaughter’s petition. The granddaughter appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hoffmann, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership