Reavis v. Slominski
Supreme Court of Nebraska
551 N.W.2d 528 (1996)
Mary Reavis (plaintiff) began working at a dental clinic owned by James Slominski (defendant) in Nebraska in 1969. Reavis married a third party in 1972. Despite Reavis’s marriage, Slominski and Reavis began to engage in sexual relations in 1973. Although Slominski never physically forced Reavis to have sex, Reavis felt that she had no other choice because she needed the job. Reavis moved away in 1975 but moved back in 1978. In 1988, Reavis again accepted a position in Slominski’s office on the condition that he leave her alone. In 1991, Slominski began kissing Reavis during an office party. Reavis initially refused, but eventually had sex with Slominski, feeling that she had no other choice. Reavis later told her husband about the event and attempted to commit suicide by ingesting sleeping pills. Eventually, Reavis brought a suit against Slominski, claiming sexual assault. The trial court refused to instruct the jury on effective consent, and a verdict was returned in favor of Reavis. Slominski’s motion for a directed verdict was denied. Slominski appealed the decision.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lanphier, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.