Reber v. Reiss

42 A.3d 1131 (2012)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Reber v. Reiss

Pennsylvania Superior Court
42 A.3d 1131 (2012)

RW

Facts

Bret Howard Reber (plaintiff) sued Andrea Lynn Reiss (defendant) for divorce. The marital property subject to the divorce court’s jurisdiction included 13 cryogenically stored pre-embryos containing the couple’s genetic material. The pre-embryos had been produced some years earlier, through in vitro fertilization, when Reiss was facing aggressive medical treatment that she rightly guessed would free her of cancer but leave her infertile. Reiss was childless and, without access to the pre-embryos, likely could never bear a child of her own. Reiss’s circumstances made adoption an impractical substitute for biological motherhood. Reber, on the other hand, had already fathered one child by another woman, and there was no biological reason that he could not do so again. Reber wanted the pre-embryos destroyed. If Reiss used the pre-embryos procreatively, Reber feared that he could neither be an important part of the resulting child’s life nor support the child financially. Reiss responded by promising to involve Reber in the child’s upbringing and to forego Reber’s financial assistance. The court granted Reber’s divorce but awarded the pre-embryos to Reiss. Reber appealed to the Pennsylvania Superior Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Strassburger, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership