Recordati S.p.A. v. Domain Name Clearing Co.
World Intellectual Property Organization Arbitration and Mediation Center
Case No. D2000-0194 (2000)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
Recordati S.p.A. (complainant) was an Italian pharmaceutical company and the owner in the United States of the registered trademark “Recordati.” In 1997, the Domain Name Clearing Company, LLC (Clearing) (respondent) registered the domain name recordati.com but did not set up a website using the domain name at that time. In 1998, Clearing put the site on hold at Recordati’s request but refused to use the domain name to make any connection to Recordati, arguing that the name was an intentional misspelling of the Italian word ricordati, which broadly meant to remember or suggested nostalgia. Clearing had not offered to sell the recordati.com domain name to Recordati, and there was no evidence that Clearing had engaged in a pattern of registering domain names incorporating registered trademarks for the purpose of preventing the owners of such marks from registering the domain names. There was also no evidence that Clearing was a competitor of Recordati. However, Clearing refused to transfer the domain name to Recordati. Recordati filed a complaint with the World Intellectual Property Organization, alleging that Clearing’s domain-name registration violated the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) because recordati.com was confusingly similar to Recordati’s registered trademark, and Clearing had no legitimate interest in the domain name.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Carson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.