Recording Industry Association of America, Inc. v. Verizon Internet Service, Inc.

351 F.3d 1229 (2003)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Recording Industry Association of America, Inc. v. Verizon Internet Service, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
351 F.3d 1229 (2003)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Individuals around the United States were able to share digital .mp3 music files with each other using their personal computers, an Internet connection, and peer-to-peer (P2P) computer programs, of which there were various kinds. The latest generation of P2P file-sharing programs allowed an Internet user to directly search the .mp3 file libraries of other users without resort to a hosting website, as had been used in the past. The unauthorized sharing of music files violated the rights of copyright owners but was difficult to stop. The Recording Industry Association of America, Inc. (RIAA) (plaintiff), as an agent of copyright owners, began issuing subpoenas under provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to Internet service providers (ISPs). The RIAA could identify the Internet Protocol (IP) addresses of alleged copyright infringers and sought to obtain subscribers’ names and addresses associated with the IP addresses. The RIAA served two subpoenas, issued under 17 U.S.C. § 512(h), on Verizon Internet Service, Inc. (Verizon) (defendant), to obtain the identities of alleged infringers of copyrights. The RIAA also requested Verizon’s assistance in removing or disabling access to the infringing sound files. Verizon refused to comply with the subpoenas, arguing that it was an ISP acting merely as a conduit for individuals using a P2P file-sharing program. In district court, the RIAA moved to compel Verizon’s production of the subscribers’ identities, while Verizon moved to quash one subpoena. The district court ordered Verizon to comply with the subpoenas and denied the motion to quash. Verizon appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership