Recording Industry Association of America, Inc. v. Verizon Internet Service, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
351 F.3d 1229 (2003)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
Individuals around the United States were able to share digital .mp3 music files with each other using their personal computers, an Internet connection, and peer-to-peer (P2P) computer programs, of which there were various kinds. The latest generation of P2P file-sharing programs allowed an Internet user to directly search the .mp3 file libraries of other users without resort to a hosting website, as had been used in the past. The unauthorized sharing of music files violated the rights of copyright owners but was difficult to stop. The Recording Industry Association of America, Inc. (RIAA) (plaintiff), as an agent of copyright owners, began issuing subpoenas under provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to Internet service providers (ISPs). The RIAA could identify the Internet Protocol (IP) addresses of alleged copyright infringers and sought to obtain subscribers’ names and addresses associated with the IP addresses. The RIAA served two subpoenas, issued under 17 U.S.C. § 512(h), on Verizon Internet Service, Inc. (Verizon) (defendant), to obtain the identities of alleged infringers of copyrights. The RIAA also requested Verizon’s assistance in removing or disabling access to the infringing sound files. Verizon refused to comply with the subpoenas, arguing that it was an ISP acting merely as a conduit for individuals using a P2P file-sharing program. In district court, the RIAA moved to compel Verizon’s production of the subscribers’ identities, while Verizon moved to quash one subpoena. The district court ordered Verizon to comply with the subpoenas and denied the motion to quash. Verizon appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.