Red Hook/Gowanus Chamber of Commerce v. New York City Board of Standards and Appeals

5 N.Y.3d 452, 805 N.Y.S.2d 525, 839 N.E.2d 878 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Red Hook/Gowanus Chamber of Commerce v. New York City Board of Standards and Appeals

New York Court of Appeals
5 N.Y.3d 452, 805 N.Y.S.2d 525, 839 N.E.2d 878 (2005)

Facts

The Red Hook/Gowanus Chamber of Commerce (chamber) (plaintiff) was an organization of local Brooklyn businesses. Claiming that it could not secure enough commercial tenants, the intended developer of a Brooklynn warehouse asked the New York City Board of Standards and Appeals (board) (defendant) to grant a zoning variance permitting the developer to use the warehouse for residential purposes instead of for industrial purposes. The chamber opposed the developer’s request, but the board granted the application. Under New York City (city) (defendant) law, the chamber had 30 days to challenge the board’s decision. On the thirtieth day after the board’s ruling, the chamber sued in the supreme court to reverse the variance. However, the chamber named only the board and the city as defendants; the chamber did not sue the developer. The city moved to dismiss the chamber’s petition on the ground that the developer was a necessary party that the chamber failed timely to sue. The chamber cross-moved to amend its petition to add the developer as a defendant. The supreme court denied the motion to dismiss and granted the motion to amend. The appellate division reversed, ruling that Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) § 1001 barred adding the developer as a defendant after the expiration of the statute of limitations because the chamber did not adequately explain its failure to sue the developer in the initial petition. The chamber appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kaye, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership