Reed, Roberts Associates, Inc. v. Strauman
Court of Appeals of New York
40 N.Y. 2d 202 (1976)
- Written by Nicholas Decoster, JD
Facts
In 1962, John Strauman (defendant) began working at Reed, Roberts Associates, Inc. (Reed Roberts) (plaintiff). As a condition of his employment, Strauman signed a restrictive-covenant agreement containing a clause that permanently prohibited Strauman from soliciting Reed Roberts’s clients in the event of his termination. Strauman was very successful at Reed Roberts and ultimately rose to the position of senior vice president of operations. The position afforded Strauman an opportunity to help shape company policy, but obtaining new customers was not part of Strauman’s duties. Eleven years after joining Reed Roberts, Strauman left to start his own company. Reed Roberts brought a suit to enforce the restrictive covenant, claiming in part that Strauman was soliciting Reed Roberts’s customers for his business, even though the potential customers for Reed Roberts’s business were obtainable through public sources. The trial court permanently enjoined Strauman from using the information he had gained at Reed Roberts to solicit Reed Roberts’s customers. The appellate division affirmed the decision, and Strauman appealed the decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wachtler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.