Reed v. Carlyle & Martin, Inc.

202 S.E.2d 874 (1974)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Reed v. Carlyle & Martin, Inc.

Supreme Court of Virginia
202 S.E.2d 874 (1974)

SC

Facts

Grayson Reed (plaintiff) worked on a farm. The farm owner purchased a livestock feed wagon that contained two exposed, revolving beaters that helped to disperse livestock feed onto a conveyor belt. The beaters consisted of metal rods and spikes. Reed and his colleague, Moten, were tasked with unloading feed from the wagon. Rather than use a pitchfork to unload the feed onto the ground, as did Moten, Reed decided to unload the feed directly onto the beaters, which had remained in operation. In doing so, Reed slipped and fell into the beaters, causing injury. Reed had been a farmer for his entire life and was familiar with the operation of the wagon. Reed brought suit against the seller, Carlyle & Martin, Inc. (Martin), the manufacturer of the wagon, Grove Manufacturing Company, and the repairer of the equipment, Carlyle & Anderson, Inc. (defendants). The defendants moved for summary judgment on the ground that Reed was contributorily negligent. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion. Reed appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Carrico, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership