From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Reed v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
723 F.2d 138 (1983)
In 1967, Reed (plaintiff), a cash-basis taxpayer and shareholder of Reed Electromech Corporation (Electromech), entered into an agreement granting Joseph Cvengros the right to purchase Reed’s Electromech stock. In November 1973, Cvengros gave notice that he would exercise his right to purchase the shares. Cvengros wanted to close the sale in 1973. Reed wanted to close early in 1974 so that he would have time to coordinate the sale of certain other securities on which he expected to take a loss. Reed wanted to write off the capital loss from those securities against the capital gain from the Electromech stock sale in 1974. With the end of the tax year approaching, Reed did not want to accrue capital gain in 1973 and capital loss in 1974. Ultimately, the parties agreed to hold the closing on December 27, 1973, but included a deferred-payment provision in the purchase-and-sale agreement. Under that provision, Cvengros placed the sale proceeds in escrow at the closing, and they were then disbursed to Reed on January 3, 1974. Reed did not enjoy any incidental benefits from the proceeds, such as investment income, while they were in escrow. The commissioner of internal revenue (defendant) found that Reed had realized income from the sale of his Electromech stock in 1973 at the time the funds were placed in escrow, and the tax court sustained the decision. Reed appealed to this court for review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Gibson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.