Reed v. General Motors Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
773 F.2d 660 (1985)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
David Reed (plaintiff) and his passengers were injured in a Louisiana car accident, which Reed alleged was caused by Brent Boudreaux and Gerard Meche. Reed sued Boudreaux and Meche, their insurance companies, and General Motors Corporation (defendants) for damages. A federal court had diversity jurisdiction to hear the case. Louisiana law allowed defendants to present evidence of their inability to pay large damage awards, and the trial judge allowed Boudreaux to show his insurance coverage was only $5,000. The judge also allowed Reed to introduce evidence that Meche's insurance coverage was $500,000. The jury found Boudreaux was 70% liable for the accident and Meche was 30% responsible. The jury awarded Reed $450,000 in damages. To the extent Boudreaux was unable to contribute to paying this amount, Louisiana law made Meche and his insurer fully responsible for payment. Meche and his insurer appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, arguing that the judge erred in admitting evidence of the amount of Meche's insurance coverage.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rubin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.