From our private database of 32,200+ case briefs...
Reed v. U.S. Department of the Interior
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
231 F.3d 501 (2000)
The Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLM) (defendant) issued an event permit for the Burning Man Festival (festival) in Nevada. The BLM issued the permit based on the festival’s past record of compliance with licensing requirements and the multiple-use land-management directive of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1701-84. Daniel Reed (plaintiff) attended the festival and pitched a tent in the Black Rock Desert playa, which was owned and managed by the BLM. However, BLM agents did not monitor the festival after 10:00 p.m. In the early morning, Reed was severely injured when a car ran over his tent. Reed sued the BLM in district court under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2679-80, claiming that four of the BLM’s actions fell outside of the FTCA’s discretionary-function exception (exception): (1) failure to warn, or require festival organizers to warn, of the danger of camping in an area that allowed nighttime vehicular travel; (2) approval of a site plan that did not separate cars from tents; (3) failure to monitor the event as required by 43 C.F.R. § 2920.9-2; and (4) failure to suspend the event permit after public safety was jeopardized. BLM Manual H-8372-1 (manual) required BLM agents to monitor events in a manner that considered the permittee’s past record of compliance. Section 2920.9-2 and the manual required a finding that a permit violation affected health and safety, prior to triggering the BLM’s duty to suspend a permit. The district court found in favor of the BLM, holding that the exception applied to the BLM’s actions. Reed appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wood Jr., J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 585,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 585,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.