Reese v. Muret

150 P.3d 309 (2007)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Reese v. Muret

Kansas Supreme Court
150 P.3d 309 (2007)

Play video

Facts

Wade “Sam” Waldschmidt, Jr. married Deloris Hibbs, and the couple had a child named Heather (plaintiff). Heather’s birth certificate listed Sam as her father, and Sam treated Heather as his own child. Later, Deloris and Sam were divorced by the order of a trial court, which awarded custody of Heather to Deloris, ordered Sam to pay child support, and awarded Sam visitation rights. Subsequently, Sam had very little contact with Heather. Sam married Sandra (defendant) before committing suicide. After a probate court appointed William Muret (defendant) as the administrator of Sam’s estate, Sandra filed a motion to require genetic testing to determine whether Heather was Sam’s daughter. The court denied Sandra’s motion. Around the same time, Heather filed a paternity action against Muret pursuant to the Kansas Parentage Act, claiming that Sam was her presumptive father. Sandra intervened and again moved for genetic testing to be conducted. The trial court denied Sandra’s motion based upon the court’s holding in In re Marriage of Ross, 783 P.2d 331 (Kan. 1989), and held that it was not in Heather’s best interests to conduct genetic testing. Sandra appealed. The appeals from the probate and paternity actions were consolidated for review by the Supreme Court of Kansas.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rosen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 733,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 733,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 733,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership