Reference re Canada Assistance Plan
Canada Supreme Court
[1991] 2 S.C.R. 525 (1991)

- Written by Kelly Simon, JD
Facts
In 1967, the government of Canada (defendant) entered into agreements under the Canada Assistance Plan (plan) with each of the country’s provincial governments. The plan authorized the Canadian government to make financial contributions toward the provinces’ expenditures on social assistance and welfare programs. Although the plan included some prerequisites related to the eligibility of provincial expenditures, each province had the authority to determine which programs operated, how the programs operated, and how much money was spent by the province on the programs. In 1990, as part of a budget reduction plan, the Canadian parliament passed the Government Expenditures Restraint Act (the act). The act limited the growth of the payments made by the Canadian government to the financially stronger provinces to 5 percent per year for fiscal years 1991 and 1992. The provincial government of British Columbia (plaintiff) and other provinces referred a question to the British Columbia Court of Appeal, asking whether the government of Canada may limit its obligation under the plan without the consent of the British Columbia provincial government. The court of appeal held that the Canadian government did not have the authority, in the absence of additional legislation, to limit its financial obligations to a province under the plan. The government of Canada appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sopinka, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.