Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Regatos v. North Fork Bank

Court of Appeals of New York
838 N.E.2d 629 (2005)


Facts

Tomáz Mendes Regatos (plaintiff) maintained a commercial bank account with Commercial Bank of New York, the predecessor to North Fork Bank (the Bank) (defendant). The account agreement between Regatos and the Bank required Regatos to notify the Bank of any irregularity regarding the account within 15 days after the bank statement was mailed or made available to Regatos. The Bank’s practice was to hold the statements for the account until Regatos requested them, rather than mailing them to him. On March 23, 2001, the Bank received a fraudulent funds-transfer order. The Bank did not follow the agreed-upon security procedures to confirm the order. The Bank honored the order and transferred $450,000 out of the account. The Bank received a second fraudulent order and transferred $150,000 out of the account, again without confirming the order with Regatos. The unauthorized transfers were discovered by Regatos on August 9, 2001 when Regatos checked his account statements. Regatos informed the Bank of the unauthorized transfers on that same day. The Bank refused to reimburse Regatos, and Regatos sued the Bank in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. A jury found in favor of Regatos, and the trial court entered a judgment against the Bank for $600,000 plus interest. The Bank appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Second Circuit then certified two multi-part questions to the Court of Appeals of New York as important questions of New York law.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Rosenblatt, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.