Regina v. Benge

176 Eng. Rep. 665 (1865)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Regina v. Benge

Maidstone Crown Court
176 Eng. Rep. 665 (1865)

JL
Regina v. Benge

Facts

Benge (defendant) was the foreman of a crew repairing rails on a railroad track. Benge had a book of scheduled trains, but he misread the schedule. Benge ordered certain rails removed from a bridge shortly before a train was scheduled. Benge followed the usual process of sending a crew member with a flag down the track to alert any approaching trains of the work being done. The flagman was supposed to go at least 1,000 yards down the track because trains could stop within 1,000 yards of applying the brake. However, the flagman only went about 540 yards down the track. Also, a train engineer should have been able to see the flag at a distance of about 500 yards, but this conductor did not see the flag until he was passing it. The train did not stop in time and wrecked, resulting in the death of many passengers. The Crown (plaintiff) charged Benge with manslaughter.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pigott, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 741,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership