Regina v. Cogan and Leak

1 Q.B. 217 (1976)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Regina v. Cogan and Leak

England and Wales High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
1 Q.B. 217 (1976)

Facts

Leak and Cogan (defendants) came home from drinking when Leak told his wife that Cogan wanted to have sex with her and that she was going to let Cogan do so. Leak then laid his wife on the bed, had sex with her, and then watched Cogan have sex with her. Leak’s wife sobbed during the entire ordeal. After Leak and Cogan were finished, they left the house to go drinking again, and Leak’s wife called the police. The police apprehended Leak and Cogan shortly afterwards. Cogan claimed that Leak’s wife consented to the ordeal. At trial, Cogan was convicted of rape because his belief that Leak’s wife had consented was unreasonable. Leak was convicted of aiding and abetting Cogan to rape Leak’s wife. Cogan’s conviction was later overturned when a ruling in a later case determined that even an unreasonable belief of consent to sex was enough to preclude a charge and conviction of rape. Leak appealed his conviction, claiming that he could not be convicted of aiding and abetting Cogan’s rape of Leak’s wife when Cogan was acquitted of rape himself.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lawton, L.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 743,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership