Regina v. Eagleton
England Court of Criminal Law
 6 Cox C.C. 559
Eagleton (defendant), a baker, contracted with a local soup kitchen to give loaves of bread to the poor. Under the contract, each needy person who presented Eagleton with a “ticket” was to get a loaf that weighed 3.5 pounds. Eagleton then turned in the tickets, along with a statement of the number of loaves supplied, to a relieving officer who would credit Eagleton in his books and make a payment thereafter. It was later learned that Eagleton had provided loaves to the poor weighing much less than the contracted 3.5 pounds, but representing the loaves as being the appropriate weight. Eagleton was convicted of attempting to obtain money by false pretenses, a misdemeanor. Eagleton appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Parke, B.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.