From our private database of 44,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Regina v. Feely
England and Wales High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
[1973] 2 W.L.R. 201
Facts
Feely (defendant) was a branch manager for a bookmaking firm. The firm sent a notice to all branch managers indicating that the practice of borrowing from tills was to stop. Nevertheless, Feely took about £30 from a branch safe. When later confronted, Feely said he borrowed the money intending to repay it once his employer paid him approximately £70. Feely was charged with theft of the £30. At trial, the judge instructed the jury that if Feely had taken the money from either the safe or the till it would be no defense for him to say he intended to repay it and that his employer owed him more than what he had taken. Feely was convicted and he appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lawton, L.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 705,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,400 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
