Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 16,500+ case briefs...

Regina v. Holland

Liverpool Assizes
174 Eng.Rep. 313 (1841)


Holland (defendant) attacked Thomas Garland with an iron instrument and, among inflicting many wounds, cut Garland across one of his fingers. Garland was instructed by a physician that he needed to have the cut finger amputated or, otherwise, it could likely lead to his death. Garland refused the amputation and ultimately died as a result. Holland was indicted for murder. At trial, the surgeon testified that if Garland's finger had been removed at his urging, Garland would not have died. Additionally, the trial judge instructed the jury that if Holland intentionally, without justification, inflicted the wound upon Garland which ultimately was the cause of Garland's death, that Holland was guilty of murder.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Maule, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 408,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,500 briefs, keyed to 223 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial