Regina v. Kingston

[1994] 3 All E.R. 353

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Regina v. Kingston

House of Lords
[1994] 3 All E.R. 353

Play video

Facts

In an attempt to blackmail Kingston (defendant), Penn placed a drug in Kingston’s drink and then photographed and audiotaped Kingston sexually assaulting a 15-year-old boy at Penn’s home. Kingston was charged with indecent assault. At trial, the judge instructed the jury that it should acquit Kingston only if it found that Kingston did not have an intent to commit indecent assault on the boy. The trial judge noted, “a drugged intent is still an intent.” The jury convicted Kingston and he appealed, arguing that “an accused person may be entitled to be acquitted if there is a possibility that although his act was intentional, the intent itself arose out of circumstances for which he bears no blame.” Writing for the court of appeal, Lord Taylor noted that if a drink or a drug is secretly administered to an unsuspecting person who then commits an illegal act because he lacked self-control, and thus lacked the required mens rea to commit the offense, the person ought to be acquitted of the offense. Lord Taylor then reversed Kingston’s conviction, and the case was appealed to the House of Lords.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mustill, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 734,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 734,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 734,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership