Reichold Chemicals, Inc.
Labor Arbitration
66 Lab. Arb. Rep. 745 (1976)
- Written by Miller Jozwiak, JD
Facts
After collective-bargaining negotiations between a union (plaintiff) and Reichold Chemicals, Inc. (Reichold) (defendant) broke down, Reichold employees went on strike for approximately three months. After the strike ended and the employees returned to work, Reichold issued a bulletin that reduced the employees’ vacation hours by one-fourth for the year (i.e., proportional to the length of the strike). During a previous labor negotiation, the parties had expressly agreed to granting vacation credit for strike time; however, they did not do so here. Instead, under the labor agreement between the union and Reichold, employees accrued vacation hours based on the length of service. Under the provision, employees did not accrue vacation hours during time spent on layoffs. Similarly, under a different provision of the agreement, employees gained seniority based on the length of service. That provision, however, also provided that the accumulation of service for seniority could be broken only by certain conditions, none of which included a strike. The union challenged Reichold’s prorated reduction of the employees’ vacation hours for time spent on strike. According to the union, because service under the seniority provision could not be broken by a strike, it followed that service under the vacation provision could not be broken by a strike. Reichold responded that the two provisions were not the same and that vacation hours could be prorated for the strike period during which employees did not work. The parties submitted the matter to arbitration.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jackson, Arbitrator)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.