Reid v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals
825 S.E.2d 555 (2019)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
A sheriff’s office placed an ad on Craigslist posing as a 15-year-old female, that is, an underage child. Richard Reid (defendant) replied to the ad. Speaking as the child, an investigator informed Reid that she was underage, but Reid continued communication through Craigslist and text messages. Reid solicited photos from the investigator, often asking for nude images and making sexual comments to the child. Reid expressed worry about being caught and requested that the child delete their conversation history. Reid and the investigator arranged to meet at a gas station. Reid requested more nude photos to ensure a serious intent to meet and had the investigator confirm that they would meet alone. Reid confirmed plans to go to the child’s home after the meeting. The investigator surveilled Reid at the meetup location. Reid sat in his car for a few minutes and then attempted to leave. The investigator pulled Reid over and confirmed his identity. Reid initially stated that he was just driving around and then admitted that he intended to meet up with an underage female. Reid did not disclose why he left the gas station. Reid was convicted of several crimes, including criminal attempt to commit child molestation. Reid appealed his conviction, arguing that the record did not support attempted child molestation. Alternatively, Reid argued that he abandoned any attempt to commit child molestation. The appellate court affirmed Reid’s other convictions and addressed the attempt conviction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rickman, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (McFadden, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.