Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Reilley v. Richards

Ohio Supreme Court
632 N.E.2d 507 (1994)


Facts

Thomas Reilley (plaintiff), a lawyer with no special experience in real estate law, entered a purchase contract to buy land from David Richards (defendant). After Reilley and Richards signed the real estate purchase agreement, Reilley discovered that nearly half the property was in a flood-hazard area. Reilley had planned to build a house on the property. There was a portion of the flood-hazard area on which nothing could be built according to a local ordinance. Even where it might have been possible to get permission to build within the flood-hazard area, Reilley’s intended builder did not want to build in the floodplain due to warranty concerns. Neither party knew about the floodplain at the time the contract was formed. The purchase agreement did contain an escape clause giving Reilley 60 days to rescind the contract if Reilley found any unacceptable conditions on the land. Reilley’s builder inspected the property within the 60-day timeframe but did not discover—and could not have discovered—the floodplain. By the time Reilley learned about the flood-hazard zone, the 60 days had passed. After making the discovery, however, Reilley sued Richards to rescind the purchase agreement on the basis of the parties’ mutual mistake. The trial court ruled in favor of Reilley. Richards appealed, and the appellate court ruled in favor of Richards on the grounds that Reilley was negligent in failing to hire engineers to discover the floodplain within the 60 days. Reilley appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Sweeney, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Bryant, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.