Reitman v. Mulkey
United States Supreme Court
387 U.S. 369 (1967)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
In 1964, California voters, by initiative and referendum in Proposition 14, passed Article I, § 26 as an amendment to the California Constitution. Article I, § 26 prohibited the State of California from making any laws that prohibited the right of property owners to discriminate against potential renters for any reason. The Mulkeys (plaintiffs) were a husband and wife who sued the Reitmans (defendants) under §§ 51 and 52 of the California Civil Code, alleging that the Reitmans refused to rent them an apartment solely on account of their race. Sections 51 and 52 of the California Civil Code prohibited race-based discrimination in property rentals. The Reitmans argued that §§ 51 and 52 were made null and void after passage of Article I, § 26 through Proposition 14. The California Supreme Court found that Proposition 14 impermissibly entangled the State of California in private discrimination and held Article I, § 26 unconstitutional. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
Dissent (Harlan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
