United States Supreme Court
387 U.S. 369 (1967)
In 1964, California voters, by initiative and referendum in Proposition 14, passed Article I, § 26 as an amendment to the California Constitution. Article I, § 26 prohibited the State of California from making any laws that prohibited the right of property owners to discriminate against potential renters for any reason. The Mulkeys (plaintiffs) were a husband and wife who sued the Reitmans (defendants) under §§ 51 and 52 of the California Constitution alleging that the Reitman’s refused to rent them an apartment solely on account of their race. Sections 51 and 52 of the California Constitution prohibited race-based discrimination in property rentals. The Reitmans argued that §§ 51 and 52 were made null and void after passage of Article I, § 26 through Proposition 14. The California Supreme Court found that Proposition 14 impermissibly entangled the State of California in private discriminations and held Article I, § 26 unconstitutional. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
Dissent (Harlan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 199,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.