Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Reliance Electric Co. v. Emerson Electric Co.

United States Supreme Court
404 U.S. 418 (1972)


Facts

In June 1967, Emerson Electric Co. (Emerson) (plaintiff) bought 13.2 percent of the outstanding stock in Dodge Manufacturing Co. (Dodge) at $63 per share. Within six months thereafter, Dodge merged with Reliance Electric Co. (Reliance) (defendant), at which time the stock was priced at $68 per share. Emerson did not want to own shares of the new merged entity, but also did not want to pay Dodge all of the profits it was going to earn by selling the stock under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Section 16(b)). To get around the requirement, Emerson sold enough of its shares in the merged entity to bring it below the 10 percent threshold prescribed in Section 16(b). Emerson paid the profits from that sale to Dodge as required in Section 16(b) and then sold the remainder of its shares for $69 per share. Emerson did not pay Dodge the profits from its second sale because at the time of that sale, as a result of the first sale, Emerson owned only 9.96 percent of Dodge’s shares. Reliance made a demand for the profits from the second sale, and Emerson filed an action seeking a declaratory judgment that it did not have to pay those profits to the Reliance/Dodge entity. The district court found Emerson liable for the profits, but the court of appeals reversed. Reliance appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.