Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Religious Technology Center v. Lerma

908 F. Supp. 1362 (1995)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 30,500+ case briefs...

Religious Technology Center v. Lerma

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

908 F. Supp. 1362 (1995)

Facts

In 1991 the Church of Scientology sued Steven Fishman, a former church member, in a federal district court in California. Fishman filed an affidavit with the court that attached 69 pages of Scientology’s information (the Fishman affidavit). In the California case, Religious Technology Center (RTC) (plaintiff) moved to seal the Fishman affidavit. The California court declined to seal the documents, and the documents were made part of the public court record until August 15, 1995. Arnaldo Lerma (defendant), another former church member, acquired a copy of the Fishman affidavit and, on August 1, 1995, posted the information on the internet. RTC obtained a temporary restraining order against Lerma to prevent any additional publication of the Fishman affidavit. On August 6, Lerma sent the Fishman affidavit to the Washington Post (the Post). RTC discovered the Post had been notified and told the Post that the information was stolen. The Post returned the actual copy of the information it received from Lerma. However, the Post knew that the Fishman affidavit was publicly available in the California case, and on August 14, the Post sent a reporter to the courthouse to receive a copy. Although RTC checked the file out all day at the California courthouse to prevent anyone from reading it, the California clerk’s office made a copy of the Fishman affidavit for the reporter, and the reporter mailed the information to the Post. The next day, on August 15, RTC again moved to seal the documents, and the documents were sealed. On August 19, the Post published an article about Scientology’s litigation tactics against critics and used three brief quotes from documents in the Fishman affidavit. RTC sued Lerma and the Post for unauthorized use and disclosure of its trade secrets.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brinkema, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 30,500 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership