Ren-Guey v. Lake Placid 1980 Olympic Games, Inc.

424 N.Y.S.2d 535 (1980)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ren-Guey v. Lake Placid 1980 Olympic Games, Inc.

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
424 N.Y.S.2d 535 (1980)

SC

Facts

The United States withdrew diplomatic recognition of the Republic of China (Taiwan) as a foreign government. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) adopted a resolution permitting both the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan to participate in the 1980 Olympics in Lake Placid, New York. However, given the United States government’s lack of recognition of Taiwan, the IOC prohibited Taiwanese athletes from using the Taiwanese flag, anthem, and emblem. The IOC required Taiwanese athletes to submit alternatives. Liang Ren-Guey (plaintiff) qualified for the Olympics and wished to compete under the Taiwanese flag, anthem, name, and emblem. Ren-Guey sued Lake Placid 1980 Olympic Games, Inc. (Lake Placid) (defendant), the IOC’s surrogate in charge of the 1980 Olympics. The United States attorney general filed a motion to submit a statement of interest in the case on behalf of the United States. The New York Supreme Court ruled in Ren-Guey’s favor. Lake Placid appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership