Renner v. Retzer Resources, Inc.

236 So. 3d 810 (2017)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Renner v. Retzer Resources, Inc.

Mississippi Supreme Court
236 So. 3d 810 (2017)

Play video

Facts

While on a road trip with his family, John Renner (plaintiff) stopped at a McDonald’s in Winona, Mississippi. After visiting the restaurant’s condiment station, Renner tripped over the leg of a highchair that was protruding from behind a half wall. Renner fell, suffering injuries to his face and shoulder. Renner sued Retzer Resources, Inc. (Retzer) (defendant), the owner and operator of the McDonald’s, for negligence. During depositions, Greta Seigel, a regular patron of the Winona McDonald’s, testified that the highchairs were regularly stored behind the half wall near the condiment station, the legs of the highchairs routinely protruded into the walkway, and multiple other patrons had similarly bumped into the highchairs. She also testified that while the highchairs themselves were visible, the legs protruding into the walkway were unexpected. Seigel had brought the situation to the attention of both the store manager and other employees on multiple occasions. The store manager, Velencia Hubbard, did not dispute that the highchairs were regularly stored behind the half wall, but she testified that she believed that to be an appropriate location for them. Retzer moved for summary judgment, and the trial court granted the motion, finding that the presence of a highchair in a restaurant was a normal and usual condition that did not support negligence liability. Renner appealed to the Mississippi Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Randolph, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership