Republic of Ecuador v. Hinchee
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
741 F.3d 1185 (2013)
A large number of indigenous Ecuadorian people sued Chevron Corporation in the Lago Agrio litigation, claiming its predecessor Texaco contaminated their land exploring for oil and caused health problems. The Ecuadorian courts ultimately awarded $9.1 billion in damages against Chevron. While the lawsuit remained pending, Chevron sought arbitration in international court, claiming the Republic of Ecuador (plaintiff) violated its bilateral-investment treaty with the United States by refusing to notify the Ecuadorian courts that Ecuador had settled and released any environmental-pollution claims against Chevron, openly campaigning for a ruling against Chevron, and failing to indemnify Chevron for the damages and costs of the lawsuit. Chevron sought production of the materials and documents from the experts the Ecuadorians used in the Lago Agrio litigation. Ecuador filed suit seeking documents from and to depose environmental engineer Dr. Robert Hinchee (defendant), who testified as an expert for Chevron, in federal district court in Florida where Hinchee lived. Specifically, Ecuador requested Hinchee’s personal notes and the email communications between Hinchee and other nonattorney experts. Chevron intervened and opposed the subpoena, produced some 94,000 pages of Hinchee’s documents, but refused to produce the remaining 1,200 as shielded from production as work product under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 26(b). The judge reviewed 40 of the retained documents, found 39 of them not privileged, and ordered Chevron to produce all remaining documents except draft reports or communications involving Chevron attorneys and their staff.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hull, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 707,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 707,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.