Rettkowski v. Department of Ecology
Washington Supreme Court
122 Wash. 2d 219, 858 P.2d 232 (1993)
- Written by Curtis Parvin, JD
Facts
For many decades, a group of ranchers (the ranchers) used Sinking Creek in Washington to water their cattle. Over time, groundwater pumping to support irrigation operations by nearby farmers, including Craig Rettkowski (the farmers) (plaintiffs), reduced the flow in Sinking Creek, interfering with the ranchers’ use of the creek. The ranchers complained to the Department of Ecology (the department) (defendant). The department determined that the ranchers’ water rights were superior to the farmers’ water rights and issued a cease-and-desist order precluding the farmers from further groundwater pumping. The farmers appealed the decision to the superior court, which held that the department had exceeded its authority in issuing the cease-and-desist order. The department and the ranchers appealed to the Washington Supreme Court, which focused on the issues of whether the department had the authority to determine water rights and issue cease-and-desist orders based on that determination.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Durham, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.