Reuber v. Food Chemical News, Inc.

925 F.2d 703 (1991)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Reuber v. Food Chemical News, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
925 F.2d 703 (1991)

Facts

Melvin Reuber (plaintiff) worked at the Frederick Cancer Research Center (the Frederick Center), which was a private institution affiliated with a government agency, the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Reuber entered himself into the public controversy surrounding the use of malathion, a pesticide, by conducting and sharing his own research and engaging in other behavior that was misleading because it falsely suggested the NCI no longer believed that malathion was noncarcinogenic. A letter of reprimand issued by Reuber’s supervisor was published by a news organization, Food Chemical News, Inc. (defendant). The letterhead stated that the Frederick Center was operated by another company for the NCI. The letter asserted Reuber improperly presented himself as operating under NCI authority and implied that a reason for Reuber’s discipline was his undermining of public trust in the NCI. Reuber sued Food Chemical News in federal court, and a judgment for defamation and invasion of privacy was entered in his favor. Food Chemical News appealed. Reuber argued against applying a fair-report privilege because the letter of reprimand was the action of a private entity, not a government action.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wilkinson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership