Reuber v. Food Chemical News, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
925 F.2d 703 (1991)
- Written by Sara Adams, JD
Facts
Melvin Reuber (plaintiff) worked at the Frederick Cancer Research Center (the Frederick Center), which was a private institution affiliated with a government agency, the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Reuber entered himself into the public controversy surrounding the use of malathion, a pesticide, by conducting and sharing his own research and engaging in other behavior that was misleading because it falsely suggested the NCI no longer believed that malathion was noncarcinogenic. A letter of reprimand issued by Reuber’s supervisor was published by a news organization, Food Chemical News, Inc. (defendant). The letterhead stated that the Frederick Center was operated by another company for the NCI. The letter asserted Reuber improperly presented himself as operating under NCI authority and implied that a reason for Reuber’s discipline was his undermining of public trust in the NCI. Reuber sued Food Chemical News in federal court, and a judgment for defamation and invasion of privacy was entered in his favor. Food Chemical News appealed. Reuber argued against applying a fair-report privilege because the letter of reprimand was the action of a private entity, not a government action.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wilkinson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.