Reuters Ltd. V. FCC
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
781 F.2d 946 (1986)
On or about August 12, 1983, Reuters Limited (Reuters) (plaintiff) filed with the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) (defendant) applications for 13 microwave radio licenses in various cities across the country. On September 23, 1983, the Commission’s Private Radio Bureau approved the 13 applications. On the same date, Associated Information Services Corporation (Associated) sought to file 39 applications in the same 13 cities. However, Associated misfiled the applications at the wrong location, and they were not filed until September 28, 1983. Consequently, at the time the Commission approved Reuters’ licenses, there were no competing applications on file. Associated protested the award of licenses to Reuters, arguing the Commission improperly granted the licenses prior to the expiration of the 60-day filing period. Associated relied on an ambiguous order regarding filing timelines issued by the FCC in a recent rulemaking proceeding. Reuters argued the Commission’s rules expressly permitted the Commission to award licenses after 30 days if no competing applications were on file. In response to Associated’s challenge, the Private Radio Bureau rescinded the 13 licenses. Reuters appealed to the full Commission. The Commission agreed with Reuters that its rules permitted the issuance of licenses after 30 days, but nevertheless rescinded its grant of the licenses and allowed Associated’s applications to stand as competing applications. The Commission found this result was in the interest of justice because its prior pronouncements were ambiguous and could be construed to guarantee a 60-day filing period. Reuters challenged the rescission of its licenses before the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Starr, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 178,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.