Revenue Procedure 86-43

1986-2 C.B. 729 (1986)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Revenue Procedure 86-43

Internal Revenue Service
1986-2 C.B. 729 (1986)

Facts

The United States Treasury Department issued Treasury Regulation § 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(3) to clarify the scope of the income tax exemption for educational organizations codified in § 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (code). The regulation was meant to exclude from the exemption organizations that existed primarily to promote unsubstantiated opinions. In Big Mama Rag, Inc. v. United States, 631 F.2d 1030 (D.C. Cir. 1980), the United States District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals held the regulation to be unconstitutionally vague. Later, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) denied the educational exemption to an anti-Semitic organization called National Alliance, and National Alliance sued. In that suit, the government, rather than invoking the text of § 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(3), justified the denial of the exemption to National Alliance by using four newly formulated criteria, collectively called the methodology test. On appeal, in National Alliance v. United States, 710 F.2d 868 (D.C. Cir. 1983), the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals endorsed the use of the methodology test and held in favor of the government. In response, the IRS issued Revenue Procedure 86-43 to formally adopt the methodology test.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership