Revenue Ruling 2001-4

2001-1 C.B. 295 (2001)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Revenue Ruling 2001-4

Internal Revenue Service
2001-1 C.B. 295 (2001)

Facts

X was a commercial airline that owned and leased aircraft that X used to transport passengers and freight. For X to maintain an operating license and airworthiness certification, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) required X to design and follow continuous-maintenance programs for the aircraft in X’s fleet. The maintenance program for each aircraft required various levels of periodic maintenance over the aircraft’s operating life. One of the required types of maintenance was a so-called “heavy maintenance visit,” which X was required to perform every eight years. Heavy maintenance visits allowed X to assess the safety and reliability levels of the aircraft’s equipment and make any repairs necessary to restore the equipment to the desirable operational levels. In one scenario involving X and X’s aircraft, X acquired an aircraft in 1984 for $15 million. X placed the aircraft into service with the reasonable expectation that the aircraft would have a useful life of up to 25 years, assuming all necessary repairs and maintenance were performed to keep the aircraft operational. In 2000, X performed a heavy maintenance visit on the aircraft. The heavy maintenance visit cost X $2 million and took 45 days, during which X disassembled the aircraft’s airframe and performed tasks including inspecting, repairing, cleaning, and repainting the airframe and performing additional maintenance work in response to manufacturer service bulletins and FAA airworthiness directives. None of the work performed during the heavy maintenance visit resulted in material upgrades, additions, or replacements that materially increased the aircraft’s value or prolonged the aircraft’s estimated 25-year useful life. Instead, the maintenance work ensured that the aircraft was still in acceptable operating condition. The Internal Revenue Service issued a revenue ruling analyzing whether the $2 million in maintenance costs incurred by X for the heavy maintenance visit were deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses under § 162 of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership